3 ms·
I think your opinion makes a lot of sense, although I believe the alternative I have in the game now also makes sense. It's all a matter of perspective. Right
by Humanista75 7mo ago
I think your opinion makes a lot of sense, although I believe the alternative I have in the game now also makes sense. It's all a matter of perspective.
Right now, I think that the way the game over is forced even with pending power-ups is a way to push the player to organize themselves better and compete with a more strategic approach.
In other words, the player has to decide between the dilemma of using the power-ups before feeling cornered or using them when they're in dire straits.
I play by using them a step before feeling cornered, and that way I avoid reaching game over with pending abilities. Either way, it's an interesting debate, and I really appreciate your point of view.
- litenboll 7mo agoI can buy that argument, basically what you are saying is that the intention is that you need to keep yourself "two bad pieces" ahead all the time. It caters to a more hardcore audience, which is totally fine :) Thanks for the discussion, I think you have a very good and open mindset. Good luck!
- Humanista75 7mo agoYes, you understood the idea perfectly! Thank you for your interest!