4 ms·

I love the website; the design, the video, the NSFW toggle, the simplicity. I love the idea; definitely something I ran into a few times before and wish I had.

I love the website; the design, the video, the NSFW toggle, the simplicity. I love the idea; definitely something I ran into a few times before and wish I had. Unfortunately, I am not installing a closed-source daemon with access to the filesystem from an unknown (to me) developer. I will bookmark this and revisit in a few weeks and hope you had published the source. :)

popalchemist 7mo ago
Agreed on all counts. It looks great! Just can't trust it unless it's transparent.
cyrusradfar 7mo ago
Totally understandable. I didn't open up the source for this as I have a mono-repo with several experiments (and websites). Happy to open the source up and link it from the existing website. I've started to have an Agent migrate it out, and will review it before calling it done. Watch https://github.com/cyrusradfar/homebrew-unf https://github.com/cyrusradfar/homebrew-unf Edit: You can download the current version now: https://github.com/cyrusradfar/homebrew-unf/archive/refs/tags/v0.17.4.tar.gz https://github.com/cyrusradfar/homebrew-unf/archive/refs/tag...
- OccamsMirror 7mo ago
  I have to agree with the previous user. I'm not brew installing a closed source daemon. I'd have to imagine that moving this out to its own repo with Claude Code would be trivial so I don't understand the resistance. This is a great idea. I look forward to seeing a proper repo for it.
  - ctmnt 7mo ago
    I agree. It’s a neat idea and I’d be interested in seeing the details. A downloadable tarball is a lot better than nothing, but it still makes more work to evaluate a random project than I’m inclined to perform. It makes me assume the commit history is ugly in some way (being charitable and assuming the code itself isn’t). Hearing that it’s developed within a monorepo of unrelated projects and experiments isn’t inspiring either. Anyway, perhaps someone else will download the source and report back. Edit: To be clear, I’m not saying any of those things are true, just that those are the first thoughts I have when someone says their source is open but makes it difficult to view. In this age in which it’s so trivial and commonplace to make source easily viewable.
    - rovr138 7mo ago
      I don't see the source in their tar archive. it's just the homebrew cask and recipe.
- rovr138 7mo ago
  > Edit: You can download the current version now: https://github.com/cyrusradfar/homebrew-unf/archive/refs/tag https://github.com/cyrusradfar/homebrew-unf/archive/refs/tag... This does not contain the source.

popalchemist 7mo ago

Agreed on all counts. It looks great! Just can't trust it unless it's transparent.

cyrusradfar 7mo ago

Totally understandable. I didn't open up the source for this as I have a mono-repo with several experiments (and websites). Happy to open the source up and link it from the existing website. I've started to have an Agent migrate it out, and will review it before calling it done. Watch https://github.com/cyrusradfar/homebrew-unf https://github.com/cyrusradfar/homebrew-unf Edit: You can download the current version now: https://github.com/cyrusradfar/homebrew-unf/archive/refs/tags/v0.17.4.tar.gz https://github.com/cyrusradfar/homebrew-unf/archive/refs/tag...

OccamsMirror 7mo ago
I have to agree with the previous user. I'm not brew installing a closed source daemon. I'd have to imagine that moving this out to its own repo with Claude Code would be trivial so I don't understand the resistance. This is a great idea. I look forward to seeing a proper repo for it.
- ctmnt 7mo ago
  I agree. It’s a neat idea and I’d be interested in seeing the details. A downloadable tarball is a lot better than nothing, but it still makes more work to evaluate a random project than I’m inclined to perform. It makes me assume the commit history is ugly in some way (being charitable and assuming the code itself isn’t). Hearing that it’s developed within a monorepo of unrelated projects and experiments isn’t inspiring either. Anyway, perhaps someone else will download the source and report back. Edit: To be clear, I’m not saying any of those things are true, just that those are the first thoughts I have when someone says their source is open but makes it difficult to view. In this age in which it’s so trivial and commonplace to make source easily viewable.
  - rovr138 7mo ago
    I don't see the source in their tar archive. it's just the homebrew cask and recipe.
rovr138 7mo ago
> Edit: You can download the current version now: https://github.com/cyrusradfar/homebrew-unf/archive/refs/tag https://github.com/cyrusradfar/homebrew-unf/archive/refs/tag... This does not contain the source.