3 ms·

Just because G&A was up $68m doesn't mean it was all spent on that one party... Edit: never mind, the report clarifies that without the party expense G&A would

by npilk 8mo ago

Just because G&A was up $68m doesn't mean it was all spent on that one party... Edit: never mind, the report clarifies that without the party expense G&A would have been flat YoY.

deleted 8mo ago
[deleted]