This is a study where reading the details is important. I’m already seeing comments guessing that the results are due to AI changing the nature of work, but the

This is a study where reading the details is important. I’m already seeing comments guessing that the results are due to AI changing the nature of work, but the paper shows that the non-work daily users are driving the result. > The highest estimates were observed among individuals using AI for personal use and > Incorporating individual terms for school, work, and personal use, only personal use was significantly associated with PHQ-9 (β = 0.31 [95% CI, 0.10-0.52]), while the other 2 were not