7 ms·
Why would they go to all the trouble of summarising the test counts in the context and writing out the full removal scope across two comment posts as a "joke"?
by cube00 8mo ago
Why would they go to all the trouble of summarising the test counts in the context and writing out the full removal scope across two comment posts as a "joke"?
I'd believe it was a joke if was a one-liner but this has far more detail then that.
this issue was more of a joke (am I allowed to do that?)
Not really a fan of the qualification here to possibly scare people off from calling them out either.
To clear, I have no problem with them hiding the repo, I have no problem with them changing their mind after the blowback, but it's frustrating when they can't own these decisions and try to hide behind it being a "joke".
- ds300 8mo agothe issue was created by claude using this skill https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/blob/main/.claude/skills/write-issue/SKILL.md https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/blob/main/.claude/skills/wr... trust me this was never a serious proposal
- cube00 8mo agoIn the interests of transparency it should be noted you are the 4th top contributor to this repo [1]. If that test summary was generated by Claude without intervention it wouldn't have estimation tildes all over the counts. Why would you bother with any intervention on Claude's output if it was only a joke, wouldn't you just dump the output and move on? [1]: https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/graphs/contributors https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/graphs/contributors
- deleted 8mo ago[deleted]