3 ms·
Employers are not always very smart. It took humanity half a millennium to realise slavery is inefficient and ditch it. Go figure.
by cynicalsecurity 8mo ago
Employers are not always very smart. It took humanity half a millennium to realise slavery is inefficient and ditch it. Go figure.
- speedgoose 8mo agoSlavery is unfortunately still a thing in too many parts of the world.
- Schmerika 8mo agoIncluding the US. And 68% of American adults don't even know it [0]. Not to mention all the foreign slavery in the supply chain, or all the slavery we've directly enabled by 'toppling dictators' who wouldn't give us their shit. 0 - https://www.merkley.senate.gov/is-slavery-still-legal-in-the-us-yes-under-the-13th-amendment-exception/ https://www.merkley.senate.gov/is-slavery-still-legal-in-the...
- n4r9 8mo agoIs that why slavery was banned?
- GaryBluto 8mo agoSlavery wasn't inefficient and was highly profitable for slaveholders.
- robtherobber 8mo agoNot contradicting the second part, but I want to emphasise that they are different things. Slavery (and capitalism) can be extremely inefficient and simultaneously wildly profitable.
- n4r9 8mo agoSurely it's meaningless to compare the efficiency of slavery vs other systems, since your set of resources is completely different.
- tgv 8mo agoYou could if you look at e.g. the crop yield (ceteris paribus). I don't know why you would, because what sane conclusion could you draw from it?
- direwolf20 8mo agoYou could compare systems to identify which one produces the greatest profit from the least costs, which the main thing an entrepreneur cares about.
- UltraSane 8mo agoExcept the slaveholders entire life revolved around managing slaves and worrying about slave revolts.
- iso1631 8mo agoNot as profitable for robot owners today
- ReptileMan 8mo agoTry 7 or 8 millennia. The Atlantic slave trade was just a rounding error in all the slaves that have ever been.