4 ms·
There's always this comment, saying that its useless to possibly govern or resist advancement or development or use of weapons capable of indiscriminate killing
by taurath 8mo ago
There's always this comment, saying that its useless to possibly govern or resist advancement or development or use of weapons capable of indiscriminate killing.
If the world actually worked like they believe it does, if restraint were just not possible, the world would have been destroyed at least 3 documented times over.
Don't listen to them.
- sincerely 8mo agoI think theyre referencing the previous Google employee protests of the company working with the Us Military
- jLaForest 8mo agoI think theyre referencing the Google AI already being used to make killing people more efficient
- b65e8bee43c2ed0 8mo agoUnited States 1945 Soviet Union 1949 United Kingdom 1952 France 1960 China 1964 Israel 1966 India 1974 South Africa 1979 Pakistan 1998 North Korea 2006 also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_latency https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_latency also, see what Ukraine and Iran got for their "restraint".
- ksynwa 8mo agoWhat are you trying to say exactly?
- b65e8bee43c2ed0 8mo agothat development and advancement of nuclear weapons had not, in fact, been contained.
- ksynwa 8mo agoHow do you know that the list wouldn't have been longer otherwise?
- gammalost 8mo agoSweden would have had its own nuclear bombs if not for the political opposition. That's at least one more that would have been on the list.
- b65e8bee43c2ed0 8mo agowill AI non-proliferation treaty make any difference when twenty countries possess weaponized superintelligence?
- remarkEon 8mo agoThe point is that the list isn't longer because the United States and USSR chose to not make it longer.