4 ms·
Then maybe Dario will realize that the moral superiority that he bases his advocacy against Chinese open models is naive at best.
by Davidzheng 8mo ago
Then maybe Dario will realize that the moral superiority that he bases his advocacy against Chinese open models is naive at best.
- jimmydoe 8mo agohis against Chinese models is smoking screen for their resistance to DOW, they are not even pretending
- jacquesm 8mo agoBetter naive than malicious.
- moozooh 8mo agoYou're saying that as if these two things are mutually exclusive.
- mrguyorama 8mo agoAt a certain level, ignorance IS malicious. If you have more money than god, you no longer get to play the "I didn't know" game. You have the resources. If you don't know, you made a choice to not know.
- jacquesm 8mo agoThe first one is definitely one we agree on and the second was one that I had not clued into so thank you.
- viking123 8mo agoEvery day I hope the Chinese models get "good enough" to drop these corporate ones. I think we are heading towards it.
- tw1984 8mo agokid, time to grow up and face the reality Chinese models are developed by Chinese corporate. they are free and open weight because they are the underdog atm. they are not here for fun, they are here to compete.
- jazzyjackson 8mo ago“I don’t need to win, I just need you to lose”
- viking123 8mo agoThe competition is good though, it will push down the prices for all of us. At some point being behind 5% won’t have much practical difference. Most people won’t even notice it.
- xvector 8mo agoThe moment the Chinese create a model that is "good enough" they won't open source it
- viking123 8mo agoI will gladly switch to that one if their CEO is less of sociopath than Altman and god forbid Amodei. In fact I use some of the new Chinese models at home and compared to Opus 4.6 AGI, the difference is getting less. Codex 5.3 xhigh is already better than opus anyway.