4 ms·
Impressive UI. I assume you must be doing some kind of RAG + audio/video transcription on all the media. What's RAG architecture did you go with?
by popalchemist 8mo ago
Impressive UI. I assume you must be doing some kind of RAG + audio/video transcription on all the media. What's RAG architecture did you go with?
- sxmawl 8mo agowe've found more success with similar directions to what claude code took. maybe its closer to hybrid+agentic RAG
- newbeeguy 8mo agoFirefox is not supported ... But why?
- ishandeveloper 8mo agoTotally fair question. I've actually been a longtime Gecko/Firefox user myself, so this one stings a bit. The short answer: Firefox doesn't support the File System Access API (https://caniuse.com/?search=File+System+Access+API https://caniuse.com/?search=File+System+Access+API). We made a deliberate decision to go client-first. Video editing happens entirely in your browser without us uploading your entire footage on our end. No bandwidth costs for you, no storing your raw video on our servers. The File System Access API is what makes that possible, and unfortunately Firefox just doesn't have it yet. It's not a forever thing though. For cloud-based projects where files live on our end anyway, Firefox support is very much on the roadmap. But for the local-first editing flow, our hands are a bit tied until Mozilla ships it. Hope that makes sense, and fingers crossed Firefox adds support soon!
- nzach 8mo agoThis is a fair tradeoff. I think you should consider putting this information in your site. I always read "we don't support Firefox" as "we are lazy", but that's not always the case.