5 ms·
Then that portion of that building could be counted towards indirect costs for that research, and the university is better off than if they had paid for the bui
by bpt3 8mo ago
Then that portion of that building could be counted towards indirect costs for that research, and the university is better off than if they had paid for the building as well as paying for the upkeep and those cost savings can be passed along to taxpayers.
Your imagined scenario doesn't apply to this very real example in the article in question though.
- momoschili 8mo agoMore often than not, the building is unnecessary. I'm sure the University s fine having a fancy new building, especially if the upkeep is offset by the American taxpayer.
- bpt3 8mo agoGood lord, most of you are really, really committed to this narrative. Have fun looking for excuses to be mad.