6 ms·
Hijacking the thread a bit here. Foundation (http://foundation.zurb.com http://foundation.zurb.com) also released 3.2 on October 26th: http://foundation.zurb.c
by ericcholis 14y ago
Hijacking the thread a bit here. Foundation (http://foundation.zurb.com http://foundation.zurb.com) also released 3.2 on October 26th:
http://foundation.zurb.com/docs/changelog.php http://foundation.zurb.com/docs/changelog.php
- rmrfrmrf 14y agoIt's kind of bad PR for Foundation junkies to try to ride on Bootstrap's coattails every time there's a Bootstrap thread on HN. I get that there's bad blood there, but it really makes the Foundation guys look desperate when you beg for attention like this.
- ericcholis 14y agoFair enough. Zurb isn't desperate for HN traffic or users. It's only fair that some of the other equally good frameworks get due attention. http://www.getskeleton.com/ http://www.getskeleton.com/ http://gumbyframework.com/ http://gumbyframework.com/ http://titanthemes.com/titan-framework-a-css-framework-for-responsive-web-designs http://titanthemes.com/titan-framework-a-css-framework-for-r... http://www.angrycreative.se/wordpress/plugins/less-framework/ http://www.angrycreative.se/wordpress/plugins/less-framework...
- oacgnol 14y agoThat's what a separate thread would be for.
- ericcholis 14y agoPerhaps I should have worded it differently then. My goal was simply to provide other relevant alternatives to bootstrap. "Then why are you posting on a completely un-related post for Bootstrap, instead of letting it stand on it's own merits?" Actually, other popular css frameworks highlighting responsive design are very relevant to Bootstrap. Normally, one could let these frameworks stand on their own merits, but it seems that any bootstrap post on HN hops the popularity train right to the front page.
- crag 14y ago"...that any bootstrap post on HN hops the popularity train right to the front page...." Doesn't mean you should jump on someone else' headline to promote Foundation. That's rude. Make you own thread. If it isn't as "popular", that's your problem.
- abhimishra 14y agoDisagree - there is nothing rude about this. The thread is not "someone else's" - it exists to benefit the community. I, and others, found these additional leads useful.
- fudged71 14y agoI found the other examples very useful as well.
- JoeCortopassi 14y ago" Zurb isn't desperate for HN traffic or users" Then why are you posting on a completely un-related post for Bootstrap, instead of letting it stand on it's own merits?
- hknews 14y agoI like it when someone lists alternatives to the current "marketing leader". I also like the energy of foundation for asserting itself, especially if other users follow on to confirm foundation's quality! It's good for end users and it gets the best product into the spotlight!
- fourstar 14y agoDon't give Bootstrap that much credit. The only reason it got popular is due to riding on the coattails of Twitter. If something is a better project (in which I believe Foundation is having used it and been to a couple Zurb talks), it should absolutely get mentioned. Also, I'm wondering why you're instigating something occluding to "bad blood". Are you serious? They are CSS frameworks being open sourced. This isn't Apple vs. Samsung. Funny how you're ridiculing options but it looks like you're new here so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.
- SkyMarshal 14y agoUpvoted. Contrary to others's ocd opinions, I have no problem with you posting this. I wasn't aware Foundation had gotten an update recently, nice to know. And while this thread is about Bootstrap, they're the two most sophisticated frontend frameworks available right now, so it's not totally unrelated.
- juddlyon 14y agoI didn't know either, I don't mind comments like this if they are actually relevant.
- darkmethod 14y agoAgreed. Competition is obviously beneficial. I appreciated the links to other front end frameworks as well. Being able to compare features and basic tenants across the two popular frameworks was a mini education and helpful.