2 ms·

You didn't understand the query How does yours compare to regexp on performance across many inputs? Regexp is incredibly fast, I doubt yours comes anywhere cl

You didn't understand the query How does yours compare to regexp on performance across many inputs? Regexp is incredibly fast, I doubt yours comes anywhere close and then there's the kicker, Ai are really good at crafting regexp, better than writing code to replace it, that's for sure --- looks like the comment I am replying to has changed the link, it was this one: https://matchlang.com/docs/api/performance https://matchlang.com/docs/api/performance Note to OP, use standard regexp benchmarks

hollowsolve 9mo ago
elaborate?
- sgt 9mo ago
  Look at a fast regex library [1] and take a subset of those tests or benchmarks and apply to match. [1] https://github.com/intel/hyperscan/tree/master https://github.com/intel/hyperscan/tree/master That could be a fun comparison. As someone mentioned, regular expressions are extremely fast, and have been benchmarked forever.