4 ms·
Except he was skeptical about Meta's effective tax rate being 3%. Why are you making up scenarios that aren't real to justify hurting him?
by kolbe 7mo ago
Except he was skeptical about Meta's effective tax rate being 3%. Why are you making up scenarios that aren't real to justify hurting him?
- loeg 7mo agoThe user you're defending (randomtoast)[1] isn't the one who expressed skepticism about the 3% claim (shubhamjain)[2]. [1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47167886 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47167886 [2]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47167698 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47167698
- kolbe 7mo agoBut it's the topic he brought this up in.
- brynnbee 7mo agoHe was asking about the trend of him commenting with "Source?" leading to downvotes on other posts. I was giving an extreme example to represent why that may be happening elsewhere. I agree that in this case with the 3% rate it's likely not applicable.