4 ms·

Step 5: reintroduce a plain-text editor [1] Step 6: GOTO 1. [1] https://github.com/microsoft/edit https://github.com/microsoft/edit

• sorenjan 8mo ago
  It hasn't gotten to that point yet, but the maintainer of edit wants to add a lot of features to it. Make Microsoft Edit a Lightweight 'VS Code for the Terminal' - https://github.com/microsoft/edit/discussions/682 https://github.com/microsoft/edit/discussions/682
  • adithyassekhar 8mo ago
    Oh god no, it's not the maintainer. It's frankly a student with no prior experience in both the language and the codebase, asking the maintainer permission for pushing a lot of ai generated code with chatgpt for his resume? Atleast he has the decency to ask for stuff first and being straight. Hilarious comment by the way https://github.com/microsoft/edit/discussions/682#discussioncomment-15902166 https://github.com/microsoft/edit/discussions/682#discussion...
    • sorenjan 8mo ago
      The maintainer is the first comment, agreeing with the post author: > I concur, but there are two issues with this: Building the foundation of an editor is way harder than building features later on top of that, and currently it is unlikely that Microsoft will fund me to spend half a year working purely on this project. So, I'll work on this whenever I can, which is not much. Maybe they're referring to the plugin system they want to implement: https://github.com/microsoft/edit/issues/17 https://github.com/microsoft/edit/issues/17
  • krater23 8mo ago
    The maintainer has used a hyped language to write a simple editor that already exists. Do I need to say more? OK. The code will be abandoned in 2 years. Maybe it doesn't comes to more features.