3 ms·

You're right, you posted a lot about LLM style but only pasted LLM output twice. I apologize for misrepresenting your posting in that fashion. I do think you w

• Imustaskforhelp 7mo ago
  > You're right, you posted a lot about LLM style but only pasted LLM output twice. I apologize for misrepresenting your posting in that fashion. Thanks for the apology, I appreciate it. > I do think you would do well to revisit the thread you linked at https://news.ycombinator.com/reply?id=46986446 https://news.ycombinator.com/reply?id=46986446, because I saw the OP's comment when it was posted, I agreed with it then and I kind of still do. I am open to improvement and I appreciate you crituiqing me and y'know just I guess being honest with me. I am gonna be honest with ya as well, I can't guarantee this overnight. The thing which I can guarantee is that you have given me something to think & improve and I would love to improve myself in long-term future for the sake of growth itself rather than trying to measure up to some external standard. Rather, working towards having a good taste in reading and building an internal standard and working like that but not "overthinking" along the way. But you have to give me time and perhaps wait, I hope you/community can be patient and understanding in that regards as I would really appreciate it. Thanks, Have a nice day.