4 ms·
Sure, but if the browser is the only thing that becomes more memory efficient that's still a substantial win.
by codebje 7mo ago
Sure, but if the browser is the only thing that becomes more memory efficient that's still a substantial win.
- medi8r 7mo agoYeah the server needs sunstantially lest ram per user than the PC. Probably 10mb per user vs. 8gb for client to have OS and browser up. Apple could lead here. They sell feels not specs so they could down OS and Browser RAM requirements and sell lower RAM entry models.
- wasfgwp 7mo agoThey did that. But when the AI craze hit turned that all the 8GB base model Macs didn’t have enough space for even basic models (in addition to the 1-2 electron apps you can run simultaneously). Of course seems like local AI is more or less a flop in the consumer market at least? But still IMHO even for general use macos with 8GB is almost unusable unless you use it like an Ipad.
- medi8r 7mo ago8GB is unusable, but is MacOS and Safari optimizabe? The point is they control the stack so they could reduce memory usage. It would be a big selling point, it could make a Mac "experience for experience" price competitive with PCs.