> There never was a cohesive generic open source community. There are no meaningful group norms. This was and always will be a fiction. It's always been a bit

> There never was a cohesive generic open source community. There are no meaningful group norms. This was and always will be a fiction. It's always been a bit splintered, but it was generally composed of 95%+ of people that know how to program. That is no longer the case in any sense. > I’m tempted to just start putting co-authored-by: Claude in every commit I make, even the ones that I write by hand, just to intentionally alienate people like you. I mean it sounds like you are already using claude for everything so this is probably a bit of a noop lol. > But if you can’t rephrase your criticism of a patch in terms of things flagged by tools like those, and you’re not claiming there’s something architecturally wrong with the way it was designed, you don’t have a criticism at all. You’re just whining. No, because doing that requires MORE rigor and work than what an LLM driven project had put into it. That difference in effort/work is not tenable, its shallow work being shown, its shallow criticisms thrown at it. All sense of depth and integrity is gone and killed.