2 ms·
But you also want smart phones, electric cars, and a navy This is kind of disingenuous. I mean, not everything used in California, needs to be manufactured in
by bilbo0s 8mo ago
But you also want smart phones, electric cars, and a navy
This is kind of disingenuous.
I mean, not everything used in California, needs to be manufactured in California. Why not manufacture it in New Mexico? Or Arkansas for that matter?
What you're implying, is that Wisconsin, Nebraska, Maine, Florida, etc, etc, etc, should all build out the manufacturing base to manufacture things that are used in those states. That's not really how a healthy economy should work.
I guess what I'm pointing out is that, we don't need to manufacture smartphones in South Dakota. It's perfectly acceptable to manufacture them in, say, New Jersey, and then ship them to South Dakota. Similarly, we don't need to manufacture everything in California.
- nailer 8mo ago> I mean, not everything used in California, needs to be manufactured in California. Not the parent but nobody is implying that. Just that most Californians consume or want these things and thus expect other states to build them.
- bilbo0s 8mo agoWhich is no different than any other state.
- nailer 8mo agoNo, other states build these things. It it a point specially about California.
- bilbo0s 8mo agoSure. Everything's built overseas. We all already know that. Why can't things be be built here, in a state other than California? What is the fixation with California? Tennessee or Nebraska would love to build smart phones, or even just the chips for smart phones. What is the reasoning for not building these things in other states?