3 ms·
Yet per capita, US vehicle occupants are more likely to be injured in general while on the road than Europeans. Perhaps the driving standards are just far too d
by Freedom2 7mo ago
Yet per capita, US vehicle occupants are more likely to be injured in general while on the road than Europeans. Perhaps the driving standards are just far too different.
- kgwgk 7mo agoThey also travel twice as much.
- atleastoptimal 7mo agoBecause US roads traffic control systems suck ALSO licenses are much easier to get, there is more of a tacit tolerance of drunk driving, and the lower rate of public transport makes more people forced to drive despite preferring not to, leading to less of a selective effect of drivers. We've consequentially paved over the issues (no pun intended) via creating a socioeconomic hierarchy of insulation from traffic injuries. Giant SUV's have become the mainstay of the upwardly mobile 30s suburbanite, who is immunized from the road hazards, collisions and dangers that would cripple sedans.
- NetMageSCW 7mo agoPer capita isn’t meaningful, try per mile.
- watwut 7mo agoIn a discussion about city design, per capita matters. That being said, EU is generally safer per km too.
- IncreasePosts 7mo agoIs that just because Americans spend a lot more time in their cars than Europeans do?
- watwut 7mo agoNo, per km Europeans are safer. Road design is safer, cars are safer.
- IncreasePosts 7mo agoI'm not sure it is so simple. Some states have death rates in line with western/northern Europe (eg massachusetts has 4 deaths per billion km, similar to Germany), but road design and cars driven in massachusetts are highly similar to states with a larger death rate(south carolina, looking at you).
- roger110 7mo agoTwo people crashing in big SUVs/trucks aren't really safer than two people crashing in smaller cars. As for the difference, my guess is the driving standards.