3 ms·
They have no real stake in any decision they make. And they are not human. Not even a sociopath or psychopathic human. At best they might be able to estimate
by Bender 9mo ago
They have no real stake in any decision they make.
And they are not human. Not even a sociopath or psychopathic human. At best they might be able to estimate casualties. LLM's probably can't even reach the logic conclusion of the fictional WOPR Joshua from the movie Wargames [1].
Make LLM's win every game of tic-tac-toe and see if it reaches the same conclusion of WOPR. [1]
...
Edit: (Answering my own question) From Gemini:
Yes, many LLMs (GPT-4, Claude 3, Llama 3) have been tested on Tic-Tac-Toe, and they generally perform poorly, often playing at or below the level of random chance. While they can understand the rules, they struggle with spatial reasoning, often trying to place a piece in an occupied spot, forgetting to block opponents, or failing to win.
If LLM's can't even figure out tic-tac-toe then surely do not give these things the ability to launch any kind of weapon. Not even rubber bands.
[1] - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s93KC4AGKnY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s93KC4AGKnY [video][6m][tic-tac-toe]
- sheiyei 9mo agoWhich makes them so great for making difficult (often bad) decisions – it wasn't me, it was the "objective" and "neutral" "superintelligence" which I totally didn't give a suggestive prompt.