3 ms·
It did run python code when I asked for a random number: https://gemini.google.com/share/dcd6658d7cc9 https://gemini.google.com/share/dcd6658d7cc9 Then I said:
by simlevesque 7mo ago
It did run python code when I asked for a random number: https://gemini.google.com/share/dcd6658d7cc9 https://gemini.google.com/share/dcd6658d7cc9
Then I said: "don't run code, just pick one" and it replied "I'll go with 7."
- basch 7mo agoBut .. how do you know? It says it wrote code, but it could just be text and markdown and template. It could just be predicting what it looks like to run code. Mine also gave me 42 before I specified 1-10. Does it always start with 42 thinking its funny?
- simlevesque 7mo agoClick on the link I provided and you'll know why I know. It's not markdown, it shows the code that was ran and the output.
- BugsJustFindMe 7mo agoBe careful. Output formatting doesn't prove what you think it does. Unless you work inside google and can inspect the computation happening, you do not have any way to know whether it's showing actual execution or only a simulacrum of execution. I've seen LLMs do exactly that and show output that is completely different from what the code actually returns.
- colonCapitalDee 7mo agoYou can literally click "Show Code"
- BugsJustFindMe 7mo agoYes. "Show Code", not "Show CPU cycles". There's a difference. Writing code is not the same as running code. It looks to you like it ran the code. But you have no proof that it did. I've seen many times LLM systems from companies that claimed that their LLMs would run code and return the output claiming that they ran some code and returned the output but the output was not what the shown code actually produced when run.
- xVedun 7mo agoMaybe the only way to be sure is to have it generate (not stable diffuse) an image with the value in there.
- BugsJustFindMe 7mo agoYou cannot know that anything it shows you was generated by executing the code and isn't merely a simulacrum of execution output. That includes images.
- Sophira 7mo agoYes, you can. In my experience, models do not tend to write their own HTML output. They tend to output something like Markdown, or a modified version of it, and they wouldn't be able to write their own HTML that the browser would parse as such.
- Sophira 7mo agoIn my experience, models do not tend to write their own HTML output. They tend to output something like Markdown, or a modified version of it, and they wouldn't be able to write their own HTML that the browser would parse as such.
- BugsJustFindMe 7mo agoWhat, in your view, does sending one markup language instead of another markup language tell you about whether the back-end executed some code or only pretended to? The front-end display is a representation of what the back-end sends it. Saying "but the back-end doesn't send HTML" is as meaningless as saying that about literally any other SPA website that builds its display from API requests that respond with JSON.
- sunaookami 7mo agoThere is being critical of something and then there is being a conspiracy theorist. Code Execution is a well-known feature of Gemini, ChatGPT, etc. and it's always shown in special blocks and it runs inside a sandbox.
- wasabi991011 7mo agoThis was a pretty easy hypothesis to test: I asked Gemini to generate 1000000 base-64 random characters (which is 20x more characters than it's output token limit). It wrote code and outputted a file of length 1000000 and with 6 bits of entropy. You can probably ask for a longer stringand do a better statistical test if it isn't convincing enough for you, but I'm pretty convinced. Transcript: https://g.co/gemini/share/1eae0a4bb3db https://g.co/gemini/share/1eae0a4bb3db