5 ms·
Wouldn't `got` be confused with OpenBSD's Got: https://gameoftrees.org/index.html https://gameoftrees.org/index.html
by 3rly 7mo ago
Wouldn't `got` be confused with OpenBSD's Got: https://gameoftrees.org/index.html https://gameoftrees.org/index.html
- odvcencio 7mo agooh wow! i really thought i was being too clever but i shouldve assumed nothing new under the sun. well im taking name suggestions now!
- boobsbr 7mo agoGoty McGotface
- sbankowi 7mo agoYAGOT (Yet Another GOT)
- bityard 7mo agoProbably taken already, better use YAGOT-NG (Next Generation) just to be safe.
- himata4113 7mo agomight be taken too so just YAGOT2 would work
- deleted 7mo ago[deleted]
- Imustaskforhelp 7mo agouGOT / uGOTme? (sort of like the idea behind uTorrent) but I will agree that sbankowi's idea of Yet another got is great as well. +1 to that as well.
- allknowingfrog 7mo agoWell, find and sed have modern "fd" and "sd" alternatives. Naming it "gt" allows you to claim that your version save 33% compared to typing "git".
- rapnie 7mo agogotgit, gotcha
- gritzko 7mo agoDon't forget to check the new name with Claude: Are there revision control systems named "got"? Searched the web Searched the web Yes! There is at least one notable revision control system named "Got" — specifically Game of Trees (Got), developed for OpenBSD. Game of Trees (Got) is a version control system which prioritizes ease of use and simplicity over flexibility. Gameoftrees It's actively developed — version 0.123 was released on February 25, 2026 Gameoftrees , just yesterday. Got uses Git repositories to store versioned data. At present, Got supports local version control operations only, and Git can be used for any functionality which has not yet been implemented in Got. It will always remain possible to work with both Got and Git on the same repository. Lobsters So "Got" is essentially a friendlier, simpler front-end to Git's underlying storage format, designed with OpenBSD's philosophy of simplicity and clean code in mind.
- Thaxll 7mo agoWhy would people be confused with something that the vast majority never heard of. Naming shouldn't care about none mainstream project.
- pronik 7mo agoI'd be more concerned about confusing it with https://github.com/sindresorhus/got https://github.com/sindresorhus/got, which is well-established (15k stars on GitHub is nothing to sneeze at).