> The output should be encoded as a pretty JSON string. So apparently that is what they consider "pretty JSON". I really don't want to see what they would cons

> The output should be encoded as a pretty JSON string. So apparently that is what they consider "pretty JSON". I really don't want to see what they would consider "ugly JSON". (I think the term they may have been looking for is "pretty-printed JSON" which implies something about the formatting rather than being a completely subjective term)