3 ms·

1.) https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/2021/07/03/the-fbis-encrypted-phone-sting-spied-on-thousands-of-criminals-worldwide-why-none-in-the-us/ https://www.san

1.) https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/2021/07/03/the-fbis-encrypted-phone-sting-spied-on-thousands-of-criminals-worldwide-why-none-in-the-us/ https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/2021/07/03/the-fbis-enc... https://www.american.edu/sis/centers/security-technology/operation-trojan-shield.cfm https://www.american.edu/sis/centers/security-technology/ope... 3.) A president cannot pardon a civil claim against a company for breach of TOS.

hrimfaxi 8mo ago
You said: > First, when it ran Anom, it went out of its way not to collect data on persons inside the United States. U.S. Anom users never had any of their data captured by the FBI because it raised profound 4th Amendment concerns. Cape is operating in the U.S. and is seeking U.S. users. Typical U.S. honeypots are generally targeted abroad. 1. People in the US were arrested for using Anom (despite the 14th amendment protecting both citizen and noncitizen alike, at least in the case where the non-US person is on US soil). 3. Fair point, though if it is truly a government sting operation I don't think you can take them to civil court either unless authorized under statute right?
- 8cvor6j844qw_d6 8mo ago
  Yeah, just a quick skim and my first thought is anom v2? Just my thoughts.