3 ms·
No need to look for malicious intentions, this is just a feature that costs money so it's very low (or zero) priority for profit driven organisations. I wonder
by integralid 8mo ago
No need to look for malicious intentions, this is just a feature that costs money so it's very low (or zero) priority for profit driven organisations.
I wonder if finding people responsible and spamming then with their own service emails would make the team care enough to fix this. But of course that's mostly dubious, probably illegal, and shouldn't be a responsibility of some vigilante hacker
- loloquwowndueo 8mo agoWith AI these days it’d cost almost zero money. /s
- b112 8mo agoIf bartenders are legally (including criminally!) liable in some jurisdictions for their customers, then certainly a chain of legal liability can exist in other industries.
- Pxtl 8mo agoYes but bartenders overserving is a crime done by a working-class person and not a wealthy business.
- CydeWeys 8mo agoWhat are you envisioning exactly?
- b112 8mo agoAm I supposed to envision something? When pointing out that legal parallels exist, to enact a solution, must I envision that solution?
- justinclift 8mo ago> No need to look for malicious intentions, this is just a feature that costs money so it's very low (or zero) priority for profit driven organisations. Malicious in-attention then, by the profit driven org? :)
- wat10000 8mo agoWhat is the word for harming other people in order to make more money for yourself, if not "malicious"?