3 ms·
AOMedia Open Audio Codec "OAC" Aims to Be the Successor to Opus
- bpavuk 8mo agoI am not that familiar with audio codecs, yet I think it's exciting if it means "music files will get smaller while keeping as much information". I keep ~50GB of FLAC music on desktop, but mostly I use MP3 320Kbps "mirror" of the music library, which is easier to sync to phone with Syncthing. the quality loss is... noticeable at best.
- theandrewbailey 8mo agoMP3 is a pretty bad codec compared to newer ones, no surprise that you noticed a quality drop. It should only be used for reasons of maximum compatibility. I was using Ogg Vorbis 20 years ago, and that was a massive step up from MP3. Now, I have FLAC, and convert to 96k Opus for mobile and browser playback. Combined with listening in the car or through subpar headphones, I don't sweat about leaving a lot of quality behind, and the space savings are worth it.
- Someone 8mo agoFTA: “So far to the new OAC codebase there has been some tuning adjustments, renaming various symbols to using an "oaci_" prefix and other preparations for establishing the new Open Audio Codec project,” So, basically all we know is that it’s a fork of Opus. https://linuxiac.com/aomedia-begins-developing-oac-next-generation-open-audio-codec/ https://linuxiac.com/aomedia-begins-developing-oac-next-gene... agrees: “Project documentation states that OAC is experimental and not production-ready. There is no finalized specification, standardization timeline, or guarantee of backward compatibility. It is also important to note that OAC currently mirrors Opus capabilities, with no publicly documented functional advantages. […] In other words, at this stage, OAC appears to be just a development fork of Opus under the Alliance for Open Media’s governance. Whether it ultimately replaces Opus or evolves into a complementary format remains to be seen.”*