5 ms·
We run an OpenClaw agent for our entire team — he lives in a group chat (although we have DMs too). - Runs our standups, checks in withe everybody EOD on block
by maebert 7mo ago
We run an OpenClaw agent for our entire team — he lives in a group chat (although we have DMs too).
- Runs our standups, checks in withe everybody EOD on blockers
- Already know what we shipped on Github and Linear so it can focus on the work that's not tracked and summarize it in the morning for everyone
- Helps with debugging customer issues
- Keeps up with twitter and competitors and lets us know if they launch new features
Besides, I'm honestly blown away by the social aspect of it. I was honestly pretty skeptical at first, but having an AI team mate is actually _fun_. There, I said it. Everybody on the team said they'd be sad if we took it away.
I'll do a write-up on our setup sometime this week, I hope others will find our approach to security posture and multi-tenant usage insightful.
- sjeiuhvdiidi 7mo ago[flagged]
- Byhird 7mo agoOut of curiousity, is it nonsense because you're a scrum master feeling threatened, or nonsense because automating rituals like those seen in SCRUM makes them less about communication and more about just doing the ritual itself?
- hollowturtle 7mo agoIt is nonsense because it's just nonsense finding a bot "funny" and the team requesting it otherwise they'd be sad. It's totally nonsense if not just marketing
- munksbeer 7mo agoYou comment is against hn guidelines: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html In particular: "Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith."
- hollowturtle 7mo agoI assume good faith and still finding it nonsense
- hboon 7mo agoIn your experience, did you (or anyone) in the team/company felt that some non-tech people were not pulling their weight, example project managers/directors who didn't seem to bring enough value and if you did, found that using OpenClaw reduces the need for those positions? Or has anyone else?
- ucffool 7mo agoHoly s*t loaded question batman
- dzink 7mo agoWhich underlying model/s do you use to power it?
- benterix 7mo agoWould you like share one small funny thing? I find these models anything but funny.
- deleted 7mo ago[deleted]
- qup 7mo agoFun is not the same as funny.
- jbotz 7mo agoNow if you have multiple teams each doing this and then have all those agents talk to each other and then report back to your team, you get "AI Hyperchat"[0], which may actually be a really good idea that has the potential to seriously improve intra-organizational communications (disruptively so). See also [1] for a VentureBeat article about the idea. [0] https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/11105240 https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/11105240 [1] https://venturebeat.com/orchestration/ai-agents-turned-super-bowl-viewers-into-one-high-iq-team-now-imagine-this https://venturebeat.com/orchestration/ai-agents-turned-super...
- stitched2gethr 7mo agoWe did the same and I wrote (admittedly had AI write) about it. https://speedscale.com/blog/building-speedy-autonomous-ai-development-agent/ https://speedscale.com/blog/building-speedy-autonomous-ai-de...
- apopapo 7mo agoThanks for sharing. Can you share an estimate of how many tokens it uses over time? Would love to know how much it costs in terms of money.
- stitched2gethr 7mo agoIt all depends on the model and how much you use it of course. We're running Opus 4.6 and on a light day it spends a dollar or two. This is just a few simple operations like "create a ticket for ..." and it's regular heartbeat checks. The heaviest day I see is $110 and on that day we were basically talking to it and having it implement features all day long.
- d342 7mo agooh thats interesting, are you getting him to scrape twitter?