4 ms·
actually I think Lisp is easier to implement than Forth, buth is it really Forth if the internals aren’t discussed? (E.g. Word secondary, threaded code, etc)
by NetMageSCW 8mo ago
actually I think Lisp is easier to implement than Forth, buth is it really Forth if the internals aren’t discussed? (E.g. Word secondary, threaded code, etc)
- lebuffon 8mo agoForth does not specify threaded code. Implementation is left to the implementor. Internally Forth can be direct threaded code, indirect threaded code, byte code, sub-routine calls or optimized native code.