5 ms·
No. It's not UI, it's HI (Human Interface) now! It's best we all get used to it. It'll be repeated again and again from now on :) Edit: This is what I mean: h
by pooriaazimi 14y ago
No. It's not UI, it's HI (Human Interface) now!
It's best we all get used to it. It'll be repeated again and again from now on :)
Edit: This is what I mean: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Interface http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Interface
> Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name. Please search for _Human Interface_ in Wikipedia to check for alternative titles or spellings.
It's still a non-word, but will be an (oft-used) word soon enough (like that damn skeumorphism thing).
- defap 14y agoApple has used the term HI for a long, long time.
- pooriaazimi 14y agoI remember HIG, surely (having read it many times, first for pleasure and now as a developer), but it was always H+I+G, never H+I+something else. But I can be mistaken... Edit: It doesn't matter if you're an iOS/OS X developer or not. Even if you're a web designer, you should really read Apple's HIGs carefully and thoroughly. They're (by any definition of the word), "great". http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#DOCUMENTATION/UserExperience/Conceptual/MobileHIG/Introduction/Introduction.html http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#DOCUMENTATION/UserEx... https://developer.apple.com/documentation/userexperience/Conceptual/AppleHIGuidelines/ https://developer.apple.com/documentation/userexperience/Con...
- panacea 14y agoWell a Director of Human Interfaces would be responsible for defining the Human Interface Guidelines.
- michaelhoffman 14y agoApple has been using the "Human Interface" terminology since the 1970s. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_Tognazzini http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_Tognazzini
- GuiA 14y agoThe academic field behind UI design is HCI (Human Computer Interaction), so HI makes more sense :)
- mmahemoff 14y agoAnd before HCI it was MMI (Man-Machine)...so the term evolves.
- GuiA 14y agoDo you have any references for that? HCI has been in use since the late 70s (I believe it originated at Xerox PARC, since the earliest literature I can find using it is from there), and is now the de-facto standard term for all major conferences/publications. On the other hand, searching "MMI" on the ACM digital library only returns it as an acronym for various more-or-less related things. Maybe MMI is a mistranslation from other languages? This Danish site [1] uses it, and I know the used French term is "Interaction Homme Machine", which I can easily imagine being translated to Man-Machine Interaction [1]: http://www.eit.ihk-edu.dk/subjects/mmi/intro.php#0 http://www.eit.ihk-edu.dk/subjects/mmi/intro.php#0
- mmahemoff 14y agoIt's mentioned here for instance http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_interface http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_interface. I always got the impression it was a term emerging from the military in the 1940s-50s, when they began to study the ergonomics of cockpits, flight control systems, etc.
- crs 14y agoWhen working with engineers from Israel, I still hear the term "MMI" used frequently. They use it the same way I would use "HMI" here in the states.
- DanBC 14y agoHuman Interface (as in Human Interface Device) was even used by MS during drafting of the USB standard. Admittedly that's hardware, not software, but Human Interface isn't a new thing.