4 ms·
The team involved in this analysis, Forensic Architecture, have a pretty decent youtube channel showing how they do things: https://www.youtube.com/@forensicarc
by denkmoon 8mo ago
The team involved in this analysis, Forensic Architecture, have a pretty decent youtube channel showing how they do things: https://www.youtube.com/@forensicarchitecture1967/videos https://www.youtube.com/@forensicarchitecture1967/videos
- richardfeynman 8mo ago[flagged]
- Sebguer 8mo agocan you provide that history? the best I can find is a single story where they incorrectly reported four children as dead, which I can only really find being discussed in reddit comments. surely if they have a 'documented history of being wrong' you're referring to something more material?
- darig 8mo ago[dead]
- jaimex2 8mo agoThis seems pretty damning. https://ngo-monitor.org/ngos/forensic-architecture/ https://ngo-monitor.org/ngos/forensic-architecture/
- austin-cheney 8mo agoI skimmed through that page but did not notice anything remotely negative.
- jaimex2 8mo ago[flagged]
- denkmoon 8mo agoDepends how much you weight you place on 'anti-Israel NGO'. Assessing for myself by simply watching the content, I do not find it objectionable. Referring to what is happening in Gaza as 'ethnic cleansing' is not biased language, it is calling a spade a spade. IMO.
- mzajc 8mo agoThe Wikipedia page for ngo-monitor.org is quite revealing: > NGO Monitor is a right-wing organization based in Jerusalem that reports on international NGO (non-governmental organisation) activity from a pro-Israel perspective. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NGO_Monitor https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NGO_Monitor
- richardfeynman 8mo ago[flagged]
- ceejayoz 8mo agoHuh. You, a comment earlier: "They also have a documented history of being wrong." Care to "refute the claims" in the linked report instead of attacking the messenger? Even the IDF had to admit it happened when the video came out. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/04/world/middleeast/gaza-israel-aid-workers-deaths-video.html https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/04/world/middleeast/gaza-isr...
- richardfeynman 8mo ago[flagged]
- Arainach 8mo agoNone of those things is "a history of getting things wrong". You've failed to link to any evidence criticizing their past investigations.
- ceejayoz 8mo agoNone of these are refutations. For example: > Overconfident negatives: no exchange of fire is a strong claim based on limited recordings. Absence of audible return fire in a few clips isn’t proof. > - Quick search reveals names of 15 dead are PRCS: Mustafa Khafaja; Ezz El-Din Shaat; Saleh Muammar; Refaat Radwan; Muhammad Bahloul; Ashraf Abu Libda; Muhammad al-Hila; Raed al-Sharif. Civil Defense: Zuhair Abdul Hamid al-Farra; Samir Yahya al-Bahapsa; Ibrahim Nabil al-Maghari; Fouad Ibrahim al-Jamal; Youssef Rassem Khalifa; Anwar al-Attar. UNRWA: Kamal Mohammed Shahtout. Even the IDF itself won't go this far in trying to muddle the waters. https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/defense-news/article-850769 https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/defense-news/article-85076... "The IDF did not use the six Hamas terrorists who were wearing dual hats, as medics and terrorists, as an excuse for the mistakes made in the episode, given that the IDF forces involved did not know whether they were Hamas – and when the soldiers got up close to them, they found that they were unarmed."
- King-Aaron 8mo ago[flagged]
- richardfeynman 8mo ago[flagged]
- OsrsNeedsf2P 8mo agoThe problem GP is the claims and the messenger are the same in this case. I have now spent 15 minutes trying to validate your claims and can't find anything substantial. It's a waste of reader's time.
- BurningFrog 8mo ago[flagged]
- cyberdick 8mo ago[flagged]