3 ms·
It’s not a “maybe”. This administration was collecting lists of people who spoke negatively about ICE from social media like a week ago. you really think they’r
by distortionfield 7mo ago
It’s not a “maybe”. This administration was collecting lists of people who spoke negatively about ICE from social media like a week ago. you really think they’re going to send them gift baskets or something?
- deleted 7mo ago[deleted]
- john_strinlai 7mo agothe point rogerrogerr is making is that a government is not going to be tripped up by "teter piel", just like you werent.
- deleted 7mo ago[deleted]
- nozzlegear 7mo agoSOTA LLMs couldn't even correctly answer whether a person should drive a car to the car wash or walk there themselves just a week ago, so it's plausible the government's tech might be tripped up here. Costs nothing to try it, at least!
- john_strinlai 7mo agothis isnt particularly against you, knowing your comment is mostly in jest, but: not everything needs to be, or should be, thought about in an "llm-first" way. a simple regex will surface all of the "obfuscated" comments, which can then be sent to some intern analyst to read.
- nozzlegear 7mo agoNo worries, I didn't take it that way. I lean anti- llm-first myself. I was actually going to make joke about levenshtein distance but figured since we're on HN, I'd lean into the LLM zeitgeist that everyone can't stop talking about here =P
- rurp 7mo agoYou think Teter Piel is going to fool Palantir spyware?
- Freedom2 7mo ago> This administration was collecting lists of people who spoke negatively about ICE from social media like a week ago. Source for this? This goes against many values of the US, so I'm surprised to see this statement thrown out so nonchalantly.
- distortionfield 7mo agoYup, absolutely I do. https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/13/technology/dhs-anti-ice-social-media.html https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/13/technology/dhs-anti-ice-s...
- deleted 7mo ago[deleted]