> But how many of those crashes not caused by inattention could have been avoided with less idiocy and more defensive driving? Most of them. We can lump toget

> But how many of those crashes not caused by inattention could have been avoided with less idiocy and more defensive driving? Most of them. We can lump together "inattention" and "idiocy" for the purposes of this conversation, because both could be massively alleviated by a good self-driving car without lidar. If you look at the parallel comments, you'll see that the majority of accidents and fatalities indeed come from these two factors combined (two-thirds coming from distraction, speeding, and impaired driving), and that kube-system is having to resort to ridiculous fallacies to try to dispute the empirical data that is available.