2 ms·
I think this was answered before, with the constraints of the architecture of the model. You can't expect something fundamentally different from an LLM, because
by gchamonlive 8mo ago
I think this was answered before, with the constraints of the architecture of the model. You can't expect something fundamentally different from an LLM, because that's how they work. It's different from other models because they were not designed for this. Maybe you were expecting more, but that's not OP's fault or demerit.
- Grimblewald 8mo agoWhat you're saying fits my understanding/expectations. However the post and the user I am replying to seem to imply different. This makes me wonder, is my understanding incomplete or is this post marketing hype dressed up as insight? So I am asking for transparency.
- gchamonlive 8mo agoWe are probably at the point where hype and insight aren't that much distinguishable other than what would bear fruit in the future, but I agree with you
- adebayoj 8mo agoIt is not hype. You can try the model on huggingface yourself to see its capabilities. My reply here was clarifying that the examples we showed were ones where the model didn't make a mistake. This is intentional, because over the next few weeks, we will show how the concepts, and attribution we enable can allow you to fix this mistakes more easily. All the claims in the post are supported by evidence, no marketing here.