3 ms·
Those plans should be in place regardless of the results of a blood test
by fletchowns 7mo ago
Those plans should be in place regardless of the results of a blood test
- renewiltord 7mo agoNo, they shouldn’t. Makes no sense to plan for living with a mental disability if you’re not close to needing it. I am absolutely not going to plan on a care facility right now. That sounds absolutely bogus.
- adrianN 7mo agoNotarizing any wishes against some medical procedures in case a sudden accident ruins your ability to dissent prevents doctors from being forced to keep your body alive as long as possible.
- tsimionescu 7mo agoThat doesn't apply to Alzheimer's disease directly though. If you don't want to live when your conscious life is limited to short flashes of awareness among a deeply terrifying melange of visions of the past and hallucinations, DNR laws don't in any way force or even allow doctors to euthanize you. You can persist in this state for many years without ever triggering a DNR check.
- adrianN 7mo agoThat is sadly true but at least you can prevent them from feeding you through a tube when you forgot how to swallow
- fletchowns 7mo agoI was more referring to an advance directive / living will sort of thing
- junon 7mo agoThat is one very, very tiny aspect of EOL planning.
- Spooky23 7mo agoMy genetics are such I'm more likely to drop dead of a heart attack too young. If I were likely to develop alzheimer's, I'd make more and more expensive accommodation for power of attorney and trusts to shield assets while I was competent to do so.
- n4r9 7mo agoI think there are many people (myself included) whose plans would change dramatically upon discovery of Alzheimer's, dementia, or some other degenerative disease. I might consider moving to somewhere with more liberal assisted suicide laws for example.
- deleted 7mo ago[deleted]