4 ms·

Frequent music chills were an unexpected side effect of my meditation practice. It matches with their "openness to experience" conclusion. I also found out tha

by krzat 7mo ago

Frequent music chills were an unexpected side effect of my meditation practice. It matches with their "openness to experience" conclusion. I also found out that you can encourage chills with meditative techniques: 1. Play your song, for example Sogno di Volare. 2. Close your eyes. 3. Think about awesome things: how cool it is that humans invented airplanes and rockets and satelites.

tummler 7mo ago
Scientific studies grasping for explanations to spiritual things always give me a smile. This is the way. It’s about opening up to the energetic experience being conveyed through the medium (art, music, whatever). Has nothing to do with individual variations in biology or physiology.
- LatencyKills 7mo ago
  > scientific studies grasping for explanations to spiritual things always give me a smile. There are no "spiritual" things. Everything we experience is based upon biology and chemistry. Where do you think the "chills" come from if not synaptic firing?
  - elemesmedve 7mo ago
    There are only "spiritual" "things". Where do you think "biology", "chemistry" and "synapses" come from?
    - fragmede 7mo ago
      They were created by magic Gaia energy spirit beings, obviously. Or God, if that is your desired flavor. Or the beings in control of the simulation we're living in.
      - deleted 7mo ago
        [deleted]
    - LatencyKills 7mo ago
      They are the result of an infinite and ever expanding cosmos; absolutely no magic thinking or beliefs are required. I don't need to pretend that magic exists just because processes are complex.
      - elemesmedve 7mo ago
        What I'm getting at is the difference between subjective experience ("chills") and any theory describing it. ("Qualia", "no amount of simulating water will make anything wet", etc.) Although personally I prefer scientific theories to describe reality (they are still the best/most useful), our experience is never "based" on theories.
        LatencyKills 7mo ago
        Well then we agree. I'm just not a fan of using the term "spiritual" for a physical event. No need to ascribe "chills" in a hand-wavy manner.
        tummler 7mo ago
        Why does the term “spiritual” bother you so much? Perhaps interrogate that.
        LatencyKills 7mo ago
        I don't really have to interrogate why the term "spiritual" has absolutely no meaning wrt the genetic underpinnings of the effects discussed in the study. The study was scientific. It isn't complicated.
        krzat 7mo ago
        IMO, if we had enough brain scans paired with descriptions of subjective experience, we could create a decent bridge between objective and subjective.
fcatalan 7mo ago
I didn't know Sogno di Volare. It does work very well, quite intense. I got me thinking... I've never taken any mind altering drugs, so I wonder how the experience compares. I guess that even if not in the same league, being "free" and without apparent side effects this is quite the "feelgood" bang for the buck.

by krzat 7mo ago

tummler 7mo ago

Scientific studies grasping for explanations to spiritual things always give me a smile. This is the way. It’s about opening up to the energetic experience being conveyed through the medium (art, music, whatever). Has nothing to do with individual variations in biology or physiology.

LatencyKills 7mo ago
> scientific studies grasping for explanations to spiritual things always give me a smile. There are no "spiritual" things. Everything we experience is based upon biology and chemistry. Where do you think the "chills" come from if not synaptic firing?
- elemesmedve 7mo ago
  There are only "spiritual" "things". Where do you think "biology", "chemistry" and "synapses" come from?
  - fragmede 7mo ago
    They were created by magic Gaia energy spirit beings, obviously. Or God, if that is your desired flavor. Or the beings in control of the simulation we're living in.
    - deleted 7mo ago
      [deleted]
  - LatencyKills 7mo ago
    They are the result of an infinite and ever expanding cosmos; absolutely no magic thinking or beliefs are required. I don't need to pretend that magic exists just because processes are complex.
    - elemesmedve 7mo ago
      What I'm getting at is the difference between subjective experience ("chills") and any theory describing it. ("Qualia", "no amount of simulating water will make anything wet", etc.) Although personally I prefer scientific theories to describe reality (they are still the best/most useful), our experience is never "based" on theories.
      - LatencyKills 7mo ago
        Well then we agree. I'm just not a fan of using the term "spiritual" for a physical event. No need to ascribe "chills" in a hand-wavy manner.
        tummler 7mo ago
        Why does the term “spiritual” bother you so much? Perhaps interrogate that.
        LatencyKills 7mo ago
        I don't really have to interrogate why the term "spiritual" has absolutely no meaning wrt the genetic underpinnings of the effects discussed in the study. The study was scientific. It isn't complicated.
      - krzat 7mo ago
        IMO, if we had enough brain scans paired with descriptions of subjective experience, we could create a decent bridge between objective and subjective.

fcatalan 7mo ago

I didn't know Sogno di Volare. It does work very well, quite intense. I got me thinking... I've never taken any mind altering drugs, so I wonder how the experience compares. I guess that even if not in the same league, being "free" and without apparent side effects this is quite the "feelgood" bang for the buck.