This is why "scientists" cannot be trusted. They "thinking" is disconnected from real world dynamics. > both being malicious is pq. Not if p -> q. If p is mal

This is why "scientists" cannot be trusted. They "thinking" is disconnected from real world dynamics. > both being malicious is pq. Not if p -> q. If p is malicious, a malicious q is most probably maliciously picked by p to review this study.