3 ms·
You can replace it with a much lower paid employee though.
by codexon 7mo ago
You can replace it with a much lower paid employee though.
- loloquwowndueo 7mo agoA lower paid and less qualified employee won’t be able to spot when the AI screws up. Having a higher-paid, qualified employee supervising multiple AIs as the human only needs to spot for mistakes - maybe.
- codexon 7mo agoI'm not sure that's entirely true. For most things, checking if a solution is correct is much easier than implementing it (page looks wrong, can't login etc...)
- loloquwowndueo 7mo agoYou’re looking at the end result, I’m looking at implementation. Engineering management, not QA.
- qudat 7mo agoYou definitely cannot. Code org, architecture, and system design are senior level roles and responsibilities.
- codexon 7mo agoAI is already aware of the best practices. It does not just blindly do what you ask of it in the simplest way.
- singpolyma3 7mo agoThat's not growth. Growth is having the existing employee do more.
- codexon 7mo agoI'm not arguing about growth. I was addressing this statement which seems to presume that AI has no effect if the job can't be removed. > If AI can't do 100% of a job then you can't remove the job.