3 ms·
You can't track individual coins, so you'd have to "taint" entire wallets. Using a mixer would taint the mixer and every wallet it sent to. I'd think this would
by wat10000 9mo ago
You can't track individual coins, so you'd have to "taint" entire wallets. Using a mixer would taint the mixer and every wallet it sent to. I'd think this would end up tainting almost everything before too long.
Bitcoin also doesn't require the receiver to authorize a transaction, so if you had control of a tainted wallet, you could taint other wallets at will, wielding it like a weapon.
Doesn't seem feasible. Not that this always stops legislators.
- StopDisinfo910 9mo ago> Using a mixer would taint the mixer and every wallet it sent to. I'd think this would end up tainting almost everything before too long. Is that actually an issue? I am looking for it but I can't see a downside.
- 0x3f 9mo agoIt was at least in theory an issue when they tried to sanction mixers. In fact people would purposely send tainted crypto to well known wallet addresses of celebrities etc. making them technically run afoul of OFAC
- wat10000 9mo agoDepends on your goal. If you want to keep the system going while blocking "dirty" money, it's not going to work. If you want to use that as a stealth method of banning the whole system, then full steam ahead.
- StopDisinfo910 9mo agoWould banning the whole system have any downside? It's still unclear to me what crypto is supposed to be useful for.