3 ms·
> years of bug fixes and edge-case improvements can't be accounted for by simply using a newer/better code-base. Partially is in fact true: Just because the Ru
by mamcx 8mo ago
> years of bug fixes and edge-case improvements can't be accounted for by simply using a newer/better code-base.
Partially is in fact true: Just because the Rust use a better type system (after ML) + better resource model (aka borrow checker), and if you are decently good, you eliminate, forever!, tons of problems.
It can't solve things that arise by complex interactions or just lack of port subtle details like in parsing poor inputs (like html) but is true that changing the language in fact solve tons of things.
- squeefers 8mo ago> but is true that changing the language in fact solve tons of things. *so long as you dont use unsafe rust **unsafe rust required for systems programming ***rust is a systems language ****does changing a default actually solve anything?