> Would we describe being Roman, a Briton or an Austro-Hungarian as a "job"? I don't think so. I think this is the articles point. We would not consider being

> Would we describe being Roman, a Briton or an Austro-Hungarian as a "job"? I don't think so. I think this is the articles point. We would not consider being Roman a job, but we would consider being a Legionary a job. The article is arguing “Viking” is more “Legionary” than “Roman.”