3 ms·
>so the smarter participants is always going to absorb the entire bankroll of the dumber participants over time.. Isn't that entirely the point? I've heard som
by modo_mario 8mo ago
>so the smarter participants is always going to absorb the entire bankroll of the dumber participants over time..
Isn't that entirely the point? I've heard some arguments about insider trading but even there i've heard it argued that that's part of the point.