3 ms·

Here's the CEO Marko Lehtimäki selling his magic AGI: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilgJKjiDLV8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilgJKjiDLV8 :D He's been a bu

Here's the CEO Marko Lehtimäki selling his magic AGI: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilgJKjiDLV8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilgJKjiDLV8 :D He's been a busy beaver!

skrebbel 7mo ago
Srsly. So it's all bogus then?
- hipsdontlie 7mo ago
  Yep, so it seems!
  - karmakurtisaani 7mo ago
    Definitely a scam.
patapong 7mo ago
Thank you for sharing this, relevant context...
mrtksn 7mo ago
I don't know about that, the last 4 years everyone is selling magical AI and AGI is around the corner. Including every single top 10 rich people. Was this AI proven to be any more fake Than Sam Altman, Elon Musk or Dario Amodei's one? Did he took similar level of money and delivered less than the promised? What's the scam exactly? They don't seem to claim AGI anyway, they say Artificial Super intelligence which is like every AI company claim. You seem to be on a mission against this CEO, maybe you can clarify a bit more about the scams you believe he is committing?
- vardump 7mo ago
  ASI is one step higher than AGI.
  - mrtksn 7mo ago
    According to whom?
    - vardump 7mo ago
      AGI is human, general level. ASI is super human level. Says so in the acronym itself.
      - mrtksn 7mo ago
        Completely false. There is nothing about humans in these acronyms.
        vardump 7mo ago
        Here's a Wikipedia article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superintelligence#Feasibility_of_artificial_superintelligence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superintelligence#Feasibility_...
        eMPee584 7mo ago
        With a bit of reading between the letters it seems obvious that for us anthropocentrics, humans are the implicit baseline measure for intelligence.
latchkey 7mo ago
Audio emdash
- Havoc 7mo ago
  oh that's a great insult
audunw 7mo ago
It should be said that in the LinkedIn post announcing this the clams are much more moderate. Like “10% along what we consider to be AGI” and “lots of work left to do” if I remember correctly. How is that different from any other R&D company working on AI? They all claim to be on the path to AGI in some form

Here's the CEO Marko Lehtimäki selling his magic AGI: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilgJKjiDLV8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilgJKjiDLV8 :D He's been a busy beaver!

skrebbel 7mo ago

Srsly. So it's all bogus then?

hipsdontlie 7mo ago
Yep, so it seems!
- karmakurtisaani 7mo ago
  Definitely a scam.

patapong 7mo ago

Thank you for sharing this, relevant context...

mrtksn 7mo ago

I don't know about that, the last 4 years everyone is selling magical AI and AGI is around the corner. Including every single top 10 rich people. Was this AI proven to be any more fake Than Sam Altman, Elon Musk or Dario Amodei's one? Did he took similar level of money and delivered less than the promised? What's the scam exactly? They don't seem to claim AGI anyway, they say Artificial Super intelligence which is like every AI company claim. You seem to be on a mission against this CEO, maybe you can clarify a bit more about the scams you believe he is committing?

vardump 7mo ago
ASI is one step higher than AGI.
- mrtksn 7mo ago
  According to whom?
  - vardump 7mo ago
    AGI is human, general level. ASI is super human level. Says so in the acronym itself.
    - mrtksn 7mo ago
      Completely false. There is nothing about humans in these acronyms.
      - vardump 7mo ago
        Here's a Wikipedia article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superintelligence#Feasibility_of_artificial_superintelligence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superintelligence#Feasibility_...
      - eMPee584 7mo ago
        With a bit of reading between the letters it seems obvious that for us anthropocentrics, humans are the implicit baseline measure for intelligence.

latchkey 7mo ago

Audio emdash

Havoc 7mo ago
oh that's a great insult

audunw 7mo ago

It should be said that in the LinkedIn post announcing this the clams are much more moderate. Like “10% along what we consider to be AGI” and “lots of work left to do” if I remember correctly. How is that different from any other R&D company working on AI? They all claim to be on the path to AGI in some form