4 ms·
Doesn't that cut both ways though? What prevents me from taking the code from dbt-fusion and AI-laundering it to include all the new features on a FOSS fork?
by pu_pe 8mo ago
Doesn't that cut both ways though? What prevents me from taking the code from dbt-fusion and AI-laundering it to include all the new features on a FOSS fork?
- fsflover 8mo agoAFAIK AIs do not learn from the proprietary code.
- recursive 8mo agoWhat would stop them? AFAIK any and all data and content that can be obtained by any means is used in model training.
- ssaboum 8mo agomost models are built on theft anyway, especially if you take the GDPR viewpoint
- fsflover 8mo agoExcept the megacorps won't let you use their closed software for learning. They're fine to use others' copyrighted materials though.
- evanjrowley 8mo agoThere are plenty of US corporations who don't look further than a SOC2 report.
- ssaboum 8mo agoreverse engineering stays under "fair use" when it's for interoperability purposes
- fsflover 8mo agoWhich is an order of magnitude harder than reading the code.
- ssaboum 8mo agoOf course but the investments needed in obfuscations and the bugs introduced are orders of magnitude more important. It looks a lot like the struggle between ad providers and ad blockers - the ad blockers may be lagging behind but eventually they catch up. Same things with scrapping