3 ms·
> How the fuck can it be the 'fastest' while > high-performance quadcore chips were long released > even before this phone came into existence? Indeed how?
by rimantas 14y ago
> How the fuck can it be the 'fastest' while
> high-performance quadcore chips were long released
> even before this phone came into existence?
Indeed how? How was scrolling on the first iPhone smoother than on current android devices running on said quad core chips?
How about understanding that processor power is not all there is?
> So may I kindly request you to cut the crap and stop the bias and avoid
> provoking people into such techno-wars?
And how about you following your own advice?
- neya 14y agoHow was scrolling on the first iPhone smoother than on current android devices running on said quad core chips? This explains your in-depth knowledge of what processors and their comparisons really mean. Thank you
- hmottestad 14y agoOn my 2. gen ipod touch scrolling is slow and lags. It was fast when I bought it though. Anandtech did a writeup on the iphone 5 performance and on the sunspider test it outperforms the galaxy 3. http://www.anandtech.com/show/6309/iphone-5a6-sunspider-performance http://www.anandtech.com/show/6309/iphone-5a6-sunspider-perf... However I didn't really look at the other tests. The ipad mini though will probably be slow. It has a chip introduced in march 2011, and back then it wasn't even the fastest chip on the market. It'll be pretty much as slow as the iphone 4s.
- Kurtz79 14y agoThis explains your in-depth knowledge of what processors and their comparisons really mean. Assuming that a quad-core processor would perform better a dual-core, without taking into account processor speed and how the underlying Os and apps exploit the extra cores shows the same "in-depth" knowledge of processors.
- Terretta 14y agoOn the contrary, what the comment shows is an understanding that "faster" in a regular consumer's mind isn't about CPU benchmarking, but about interacting with the device.