3 ms·
The difference is that content creator can put the video on their own website and that domain won't get blocked by my ISP. It might get seized later after some
by petcat 8mo ago
The difference is that content creator can put the video on their own website and that domain won't get blocked by my ISP. It might get seized later after some judicial review.
- deleted 8mo ago[deleted]
- GTP 8mo agoNot sure about this, couldn't they send the very same DMCA takedown request to the ISP or the hosting provider?
- petcat 8mo agoNo, they can't. It's why ISP -level blocks are non-existent in USA. And there's no "hosting provider" in this scenario assuming the person self-hosts on their own server.
- GTP 8mo agoSo, if my understanding is correct, a DMCA takedown request can only be sent to whatever entity is actually storing the data. So the ISP doesn't get involved. If someone is self-hosting, they are the ones receiving the takedown request, while if they're relying on an hosting provider, the provider gets the request. Is this correct?