Per the same wiki[0], the theory seems like pseudo-science: > lacks testability, is conceptually ambiguous, and exaggerates the role of “comprehensible input”

Per the same wiki[0], the theory seems like pseudo-science: > lacks testability, is conceptually ambiguous, and exaggerates the role of “comprehensible input” in language acquisition. [0]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Input_hypothesis#Critiques_of_the_Comprehensible_Input_Hypothesis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Input_hypothesis#Critiques_of_...