3 ms·
The comparison only starts to make sense in a post-work society where there is no working-class, whose existence depends on working. Unfortunately these compan
by cors-fls 7mo ago
The comparison only starts to make sense in a post-work society where there is no working-class, whose existence depends on working.
Unfortunately these companies are working to eliminate jobs, but not in any way making a path for a transition to a post-work society.
- iberator 7mo agoThis! AI is taking jobs faster than making new ones! No field is safe and trying to switch careers over 40 is almost impossible. Even flipping burgers is nearly impossible (very hard to do without pior experience at such age).
- anonzzzies 7mo agoOver 40 at least you are almost halfway. Definitely you can switch, if you are a half decent thinker, most things are possible; I am sure you can become an electrician and that, at least where I live, makes very good money. Plumbers you cannot find if you are keedeep in your own poop here. In my home country my old classmates (I have an electrician degree but became a software engineer) are making more than most programmers being electricians. Not sure what is wrong with someone who cannot flip burgers after 40.
- iberator 7mo agoHave you tried flip burgers after 20 years in IT and zero manual labor? Forced downshift is BRUTAL. Youngsters are 2x faster than you and precise. I'm not from USA tho. I was SHOCKED that I was the worst at flipping the burgers at McDonald's. Pace is CRAZY and stress is NOTHING in comparison to let's say dropping production database or shipping 2 months late in startup. Shit just looks easy, but noise, speed, temp and pressure (constant KPI over your head) is CRAAAAAZY. Got kicked out after 3 months :| Got new job at tech support
- UltraSane 7mo agoThey ARE, just the post-work society is limited to the people who own the AIs
- squeefers 7mo agopost-work in that sense is as old as civilization. there is no post-work without some kind of dominating your fellow man
- stevefan1999 7mo agoThey are not eliminating job, you still have jobs in 1984 which is where we are heading to. You still need to hire someone to do the mass surveillance and policing, and enforcing the laws that are getting more and more draconian day by day. And you still need people to instigate-cough-motivate hate on something in order to keep the momentum of the society to shift the focus. Those still took labor but AI makes it easier. We are indeed entering a post-job-scarity environment though. You see a lot of ghost posting and lack of response for years now, 6 out of 10 application is ghosted, 2 out of 10 said no, and just a few remaining. Jobs are getting rarer and are going to be more of a status rather than for breadwinning
- uncletaco 7mo agoIt really sucks that everyone’s go to dystopia is 1984. Especially in this case given 1984 required the active participation of millions of citizens whereas Brave New World maps better where control is enforced through comfort and irrelevance instead of force. The tech dystopia doesn’t even try to flatter us by assuming we’re important enough to oppress individually.
- joquarky 7mo agoIf we're closer to BNW, then where are the comforts? Everything that were comforts before COVID are far too expensive now. Even the bread and circuses are gradually being taken away.
- jjj123 7mo agoThe comforts are digital. TikTok, YouTube, Twitch, Instagram, video games.
- stevefan1999 7mo agoThe comforts, you mean soma? Well, besides from the fentanyl and tranq that turns people into almost-literal zombies since they can't get high from oxycontin and from codein no more, now instead we have all the free dopamine hits from gacha game lootboxes, endless attention seeking short videos, that is, tiktok/youtube shorts and instagram reels. Sometimes you feel high in the ups and lows of stock market and crypto bro doing rug pulls too. I have to unfortunately say I also fell into some of those lately, mostly in gacha games and opening weapon cases in CSGO, and for some reason I got rid of instagram which is a good thing I guess? After all, "attention is all you need". Although it is nothing but just a title of the paper who introduced us to "transformers", and enabled all this AI slop lately (note: I'm not against LLM "AI" but I'm against using it in an irresponsibly, e.g. vibe coding without knowing your domain knowledge in the first place is one), but it is quite a dark humor to me that we can actually use this title literally to describe a lot of real world phenomemon. All of that to make you feel numb in the rat race to the bottom. I don't think your argument that we are closer to BNM than 1984 is wrong, just that the antifa and all the ICE, and the politics fiasco makes me feel like it is more 1984 than BNM. Or maybe we have a super deluxe package to have both.
- squidbeak 7mo agoThe elimination of jobs necessarily 'makes a path' to a post-work society. Post-work couldn't exist without it. Beyond that, it isn't in AI companies' power to shape economies and societies for post-work (which is what I assume you're really getting at here). All Altman, Amodei, Hassabis and the others can do is alert policymakers to what's coming, and they're trying pretty hard to do that, aren't they? - often in the teeth of the skepticism we see so much of on this site. Really if policy makers won't look ahead, the AI companies can't be blamed for the bumps we're going hit.
- jplusequalt 7mo ago>they're trying pretty hard to do that, aren't they How so? Throwing out the term "UBI" every once in a while doesn't miraculously make it economically viable.
- squidbeak 7mo agoDo you really pay so little attention to the space that you think this is all they do? Almost every public discussion or interview involving these figures turns at some point to society's unpreparedness for what's coming, for instance Amodei's interview last week. https://www.dwarkesh.com/p/dario-amodei-2 https://www.dwarkesh.com/p/dario-amodei-2
- jplusequalt 7mo agoHow do these interviews magically make the hard economics of UBI viable? Read up on UBI a little bit, and you'll quickly realize that it's far more expensive than universal healthcare, and we can't even get our politicians onboard with that.
- squidbeak 7mo agoThat's uncertain in a post-work economy or even for the transition. Some mechanism will need to exist for the abundance resulting from automation to be distributed fairly - in both the post-work era and during the transition to it. Also measures to ensure production of essential goods that might otherwise disappear with deflation. This is all out of scope for AI companies, unless you fancy putting off a response until full automation, and anointing them as (fingers crossed) benign dictators for life?