How did you vet the quality of the documentation? I have no doubt that an LLM could produce a great deal of plausible-sounding documentation in short order. Eve

How did you vet the quality of the documentation? I have no doubt that an LLM could produce a great deal of plausible-sounding documentation in short order. Even assuming you’re already completely familiar with the code base, reading through that documentation and fact checking it would take a great deal of effort. What’s the quality like? I’d expect it to be riddled with subtly wrong explanations. Is Claude really that much better than older models (eg. GPT-4)? Edit: Oops, just saw your other comment saying you’d verified it manually.