3 ms·
I missed the subtlety? I linked the paper! I read the paper. Yeah. they wrote the tests, which is how this worked! how the heck do you think it was supposed to
by selridge 8mo ago
I missed the subtlety?
I linked the paper! I read the paper. Yeah. they wrote the tests, which is how this worked! how the heck do you think it was supposed to work?
the fact that they needed to write the tests was just the means to implementation. It didn't change the non-LLM labor economics of the problem.
- mattmanser 8mo agoNo, I meant subtlety of definition, you've attributed the diligence to the LLM when in fact it's the tests that provide that. You've unfortunately committed the big sin of anthropomorphizing the LLM and calling it diligent. An LLM cannot be diligant, it's stochastic so it's literally impossible for it to be diligant. Writing all those tests was diligant.
- selridge 8mo agoI didn’t attribute diligence to anything. I’m not worried about the personal character of diligence. I’m interested in what the technology unlocked and how things made with it are materially different in terms of labor configurations.
- selridge 8mo agoLmfao I’ve committed the sin of anthropomorphism. Fadda forgive me! C’mon pal.