3 ms·

You seem to be implying that the argument is absurd, but reductio ad absurdum is valid. "If X were true then we would have impossibility Y, so X must be false.

by cbr 14y ago

You seem to be implying that the argument is absurd, but reductio ad absurdum is valid. "If X were true then we would have impossibility Y, so X must be false."